amendment9


 * //__steven penna is doing__// May 25, 1891, //Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford

bostford was riding a train when the driver of the train took a swift turn that caused the botsford to fall and hit her head on the floor causing a concussing and spinal damages. the compiny refused to pay for any of the medical bills. The emotinal damage and the damage of her bill were rights that she felt were not listed in the constitution. the supream court looked over the case and ruled as followed. Union Pacific Railway Co. was to pay for the medical damages of the concotion and the spinal injuries but the emotinal damage was not to be payed for under the ninth amendment of the constitution.

__Garrett is doing Doe Vs. Bolton__//**

1) Kate Lennox 2) Roe v. Wade (1973) 3) A pregnant single woman named Roe needed an abortion but it was against the law in Texas. Doe interterfed with this. 4) In conclusion Roe was able to get an abortion because the nineth amendment gaurentee us personal privacy rights. 5) Shows that people shouldn't interfer with other's buisness because

Bowers v. hardwick tom hildebrand

1FRANK 2Griwold v. Connecticut 3Griswold used birth controll pills while at the time Connecticut did not allow birth controll pills. 4The supreme court decided that this did go against the ninth amendment for privacy. The court overturned griswolds conviction. 5Now people may use berth controll pills.
 * __Frank is doing Griswold v. Connecticut__

ana is doing Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority-** Facts of the CaseThe Tennessee Valley Authority was a government corporation established as part of the New Deal to improve the economy of the state. For example, projects of the TVA included improving navigation on the state's rivers, constructing flood control projects, and generating hydroelectric power. Shareholders in a private Tennessee power company sued to prevent the TVA from acquiring over half of the company's property and equipment. The proposed contract which detailed the sale would allow the government agency to allocate electric power to consumers. 1. Sam Mornhineway 2. Troxel vs. Granville 3.
 * Abstract || Oral Argument: || Thursday, December 19, 1935 ||
 * Decision: || Monday, February 17, 1936 ||
 * Categories: || congress, justiciability, monopoly, property, tenth amendment, war powers ||  || Advocates || Not available ||   ||
 * Sam Mornhineway is doing .......**[|//Troxel v. Granville//] (2000):

1. Kate Lennox 2. Gonzales v. Oregon (2006) 3. The Controlled Substances Act does not empower the General of the United States to prohibit doctors from prescribing regulated drugs for use in patient suicide. 4. It really does empower them. 5. This mean docters can't give patient's drugs to make sure they don't commite suicide.

1.Kelly Giardina 2. Griswold vs. Connecticut 1965 3. Griswold was using birth control pills and connecticut didnt allow birth control pills 4.The supreme court decided this did not go against the ninth amendment 5.Now all people in connecticut can use birth control pills.