Claires+5+CASES

WIKI: the 5 cases I'm doing!
//Okayyyyyyy...first, I'm doing:// 1.UNITED STATES VS> EICHMEN(1st amendment)*1990*thought it was limiting freedo of speech(flag burining)*eichmen won in favor of court*country had more freedommm 2. INDIANA VS. US(amendment 14)*Indiana didnt want photo I.D. to vote*U.S won*People from Indiana now had to use photo I.D. to vote, making the country safer. 3. OREGON VS. MITCHELL (2ND AMENDMENT)*1970*Oregon did not wish to lower the voting age to 18*Oregon lost case*Country was not that impacted* 4. STANFORD v. KENTUCKY(8th Amendment)*1989*ddnt believe fair that if u comit urder u shud then b murdered.*The Supreme Court affirmed Stanford's death sentence.*Under //Stanford,// the government may execute people who are sixteen years old or older when they commit murder. 5. Berger Vs. NY*1967*whether or not to use wiretap*Desicion: Berger lost* This case is important because it extends the right to property to the more abstract property, such as conversation, rather than the purely physical property.